Lif Chat - selected strong ...?
when the Lif Chat - viewed with a political eye, you realize this is campaign-driven themes to ask not just what or concerned, but especially the question of strong selection. this is legitimate, and also the intention, however, if the content does not ask to be answered or I find that very sad.
I have four questions asked - one of them critical, 3 pure substance, unfortunately not come to pity.
seems all planned out from az.
but glad the answers by Heide Schmidt (from Gruener view) :
all on a green line - even the VP speaks of Europe-wide referendums - like the G had the gefodert from the beginning.
interesting for me this question:
differs also in other issues, the LIF little from the Green Party:
active as I was by the Gruen CHAT hardly convinced by the response at all. For the Greens are much himself, and the "argument" would strengthen the LiF Gruen is simply wrong. There are socio-political overlaps, yes, but what the example As for tuition, the LIF is for a reintroduction:
to ask
13:40 [Comment by Christoph]
they would agree to a re-introduction of tuition fees?
has been answered
This certainly is not. But if the academic offer true (yet this is not the case), you should definitely talk about an acceptable, socially unerring financing model ...
and for me to say this safely, but others will.
this is a basic example where I can not go along, free education from kindergarten to Study. Just for apprentices (Lehrlingspruefung etc.) However, this is a different story
the end I would like to hold on - I hope the LiF comes to parliament, but I am skeptical because of Zach's history.
I think the Lif RECOURSE below 4% and then fall FPÖ, BZÖ ÖVP and SPÖ and the Greens 0.3% of them. at least then selects each LIF voters to 15%, the Green party with ;-)'s also what ...
right?
now: Live chat with Heide Schmidt
when the Lif Chat - viewed with a political eye, you realize this is campaign-driven themes to ask not just what or concerned, but especially the question of strong selection. this is legitimate, and also the intention, however, if the content does not ask to be answered or I find that very sad.
I have four questions asked - one of them critical, 3 pure substance, unfortunately not come to pity.
seems all planned out from az.
but glad the answers by Heide Schmidt (from Gruener view) :
| 13:45 | [Comment by Martina] How would your model from immigration? |
| 13:46 | Heide Schmidt : I consider something of a points system that is based on various criteria, which are mutually intelligible and fair. or Dear Mrs. Smith, why They are against a referendum on the EU Treaty?
|
interesting for me this question:
| 13:51 | [Comment by Philip] Addendum: What do you think of this bashing the Greens? I (martin rutter) allow me to find an answer "as" Heide Schmidt |
| 13:52 | Heide Schmidt : I think their strategy to understand, I can understand the Greens are critical of us against . Zach Termination for EADS lobbying Haselsteiner supporting players, including some abroad. Closer look is legitimate, and I as a liberal it is also important that all looked closely - and we, at . The original response, however, was different: 13:52 Heide Schmidt : I think their strategy party, but not properly oriented and that is sad. You should know that two parties in Parliament (and we would have at least seven seats) can do more than a single, even if they had to give a mandate to us. Somehow, they act like old trade unionist, which is all about vested rights. For me, this is disappointing. The answer: |
| 13:52 | [Comment by Emma] Dear Ms. Schmidt, as first-time voters, I am very glad choose an alternative to the Greens put on! Good luck |
differs also in other issues, the LIF little from the Green Party:
| 13:56 | [Comment by Martina] you are currently for full membership of Turkey to the EU. Why? |
| 13:57 | Heide Schmidt : I am in favor of negotiating with Turkey to join back. Whether they meet the criteria really is able to meet in the foreseeable future, is open. But I believe that in the interest of us should be all, Turkey on their way to give in conformity with human rights and democracy incentive backing. Whether it succeeds is, however, especially her.
|
| 14:01 | [Comment by Haens] that with the abolition of the armed forces I do not quite understand. who does and who then pays the civil protection (floods and avalanches) and who pays for the nursing staff if there is no civil servant is more? I think the benefits of this moment Austria cheap labor and can not afford expensive employed in the area ... |
| 14:03 | Heide Schmidt : I think it is totally wrong, basic military and civil servants for these important tasks were, "exploit". We have the function of both the social and the other tasks for the community to organize so that they can be made paid. The army has mainly military in nature (for they are formed) and they are to me better off in a European army. |
| | |
active as I was by the Gruen CHAT hardly convinced by the response at all. For the Greens are much himself, and the "argument" would strengthen the LiF Gruen is simply wrong. There are socio-political overlaps, yes, but what the example As for tuition, the LIF is for a reintroduction:
to ask
they would agree to a re-introduction of tuition fees?
has been answered
This certainly is not. But if the academic offer true (yet this is not the case), you should definitely talk about an acceptable, socially unerring financing model ...
and for me to say this safely, but others will.
this is a basic example where I can not go along, free education from kindergarten to Study. Just for apprentices (Lehrlingspruefung etc.) However, this is a different story
the end I would like to hold on - I hope the LiF comes to parliament, but I am skeptical because of Zach's history.
I think the Lif RECOURSE below 4% and then fall FPÖ, BZÖ ÖVP and SPÖ and the Greens 0.3% of them. at least then selects each LIF voters to 15%, the Green party with ;-)'s also what ...
right?
| | |
0 comments:
Post a Comment