Hopnotise Korean Movie Online

What does the election result in Vorarlberg?

short, little new.

The FPOe benefited largely at the expense of the SPÖ.

the ÖVP has apparently not too much wrong otherwise they would have lost everything.

The Greens do not have too many seemingly better done - otherwise the results would be better - although you have to say the votes were more important as the turnout is higher (does however f. all parties)

The SPOE has to deal with the country and foreigners election campaign of the FP problems, in particular a VP, the mighty little positioning in the "social" permits.
A comment me here is still important, although the Social Democrats lose as many votes can SORA demonstrate no significant migration to the Greens.

But one falls to the interested observer, to - the BZÖ is far worse than expected. The BZÖ ziehlt mainly from on VP alarmed at, and in a 50% state of VP only to get something more than 1% is bad, even worse as the party "Gsiberger" and as the National Party.

An addendum to the FP - so great and perfect is not.
defacto it is, 1999 to 27.41% (52 444 votes), 2009 25.25% (44,122 votes) at 2% loss of votes in absolute terms, but means less than the 8,000 voters in the election before last. However, the cut in JungwaehlerInnen considerably and lead to my opinion on the weakness of other parties in the youth back. In particular, the Greens lose the youth, that is bad and needs to think about.

Access Ten Sports On Nilesat

Lafontaine or Super electoral reform in election year?

Lafontaine it seems made it to the last state elections have to split the German party system. Richard David Precht calls, in the talk show "People euromaxx" a lame Swiss consociational democracy. Is this a solution of the problems? Precht forget the size of the discovery of the Greek majority democracy. Suddenly in the history of mankind was the majority of the people decide about choosing between black and white stones. This triggered an explosion of reason from 2500 years ago: in science and philosophy. Avoidant personality suddenly decided with the autonomous reason and not the existing power or a shaman religion. Suddenly there was power on time and the inherent opportunity for change of power in a Persoenlichkeitswahl. The fear of loss of power led to more reason and rationality. As the story grew slowly approached the Parteiensytem and evolved so that the thinking in groups and dependencies, the autonomous association of interest.

What we still take away the breath, as the majority Americans suddenly a black African was elected president. Or as President SBY in Indonesia swept away the old system of power. Or, as in Japan for the first time in 50 years, the opposition causes the change of power. Or, as in Burma weak petite woman, Aung San Suu Kyi, already under house arrest, a 30-year military dictatorship in his place and had since then holds as a Nobel laureate under house arrest for another 20 years the world under the spell. The many years of Nelson Mandela on Robben Iceland and many other examples show that the change of power by keeping the majority of the people of the world in suspense.

When the people elected by a majority in West Germany, Chancellor or Chancellor who will? If Angela Merkel against Frank Steinmeier would stand for election, only then to Germany ready for democracy, and that means away from the Verhaeltniswahl, even to use the ballot! And over the three-person constituency would be mandatory for candidates with primaries up!



(read for better understanding the previous entry or go to http://www.2009-de.com/ or http://sites.google.com/site/dreipersonenwahlkreis/ or http://sites.google.com/site/wahlreform/Home )